Wednesday, May 13, 2015

Mobile Cramming/ Guinta


Missoulian: Montana receives $306K in Verizon, Sprint settlement
AG Fox Announces $158 Million Mobile Cramming Settlements with Sprint, Verizon
“Attorney General Fox announced today that his Office of Consumer Protection—along with the Attorneys General of the other 49 States and the District of Columbia, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the Federal Communications Commission—reached settlements with Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”) and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”), that include $158 million in payments, and that resolve allegations that Sprint and Verizon placed charges for third-party services on consumers’ mobile telephone bills that were not authorized by the consumers, a practice known as “mobile cramming.””


Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Missoula Rape Response/ Montana Bills/ FBI Hair Analysis

Missoulian: DOJ: Missoula police make 'tremendous' progress on rape response
United States Attorney Michael W. Cotter Delivers Remarks on the Missoula Police Department's Full Compliance with Agreement
“It goes without saying that rape is a horribly violent crime with devastating consequences to the victim. Whether the rape is committed by an acquaintance or stranger, victims find themselves in a very, very dark place. When the Department of Justice demonstrated that gender bias was undermining Missoula’s law enforcement response to sexual assault, both the Missoula Police and University of Montana immediately agreed to a broad set of fundamental changes that began to dramatically improve their ability to protect victims of sexual assault.  These reforms have made the Missoula Police Department more accountable, transparent and credible.  With accountability, transparency and credibility comes community trust. Today, the Missoula Police Department is stronger and trusted.  Indeed, Missoula is a model for every town in this nation to emulate.”


Missoulian: FBI hair analysis problems reveal limits of forensic science
FBI/DOJ Microscopic Hair Comparison Analysis Review
“The FBI, in conjunction with the Department of Justice (DOJ), is engaged in a review of scientific testimony provided by FBI Laboratory examiners in cases involving microscopic hair comparisons.

The purpose of the review is to ensure that FBI Laboratory examiner testimony regarding microscopic hair comparison analysis met accepted scientific standards. In cases in which those standards were not met, remedial action may be taken if appropriate.”

Friday, May 8, 2015

Justice Dept. Investigates Baltimore/ Iran Legislation/ VE Day

Justice Department Opens Pattern or Practice Investigation into the Baltimore Police Department
“During the course of the investigation, the Justice Department will consider all relevant information, particularly the efforts that BPD has undertaken to ensure compliance with federal law, and the experiences and views of the community.  The Justice Department has taken similar steps involving a variety of state and local law enforcement agencies, both large and small, in jurisdictions throughout the United States.  These investigations have in many instances resulted in comprehensive, court-overseen agreements to fundamentally change the law enforcement agency’s police practices.”





Two Down, One to Go: Preparing Soldiers for More War-Video
“After the Allied victory was declared against Nazi Germany on May 8, 1945 (a date known to history as V-E Day), US military officials presented troops with Two Down, One to Go, a film that serves as both Q+A session and pep talk to prepare them to shift their attention to Japan.”

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

License-plate Renewal/ VE Day/ Income Tax Veto



VE Day- Library of Congress
“Eleven months after Allied forces landed on the beaches of Normandy, the German Army, pushed back to the streets of Berlin, surrendered. The relief that all American soldiers felt was tempered by the realization that the war wasn’t yet won. Some would ship out to the Pacific Theater, though few of them saw any action. Others stayed behind as occupiers or, in a few instances, participants in the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials.”