Friday, January 17, 2014

NSA Spying/ Federal Budget



Presidential Policy Directive -- Signals Intelligence Activities
“The collection of signals intelligence is necessary for the United States to advance its national security and foreign policy interests and to protect its citizens and the citizens of its allies and partners from harm. At the same time, signals intelligence activities and the possibility that such activities may be improperly disclosed to the public pose multiple risks. These include risks to: our relationships with other nations, including the cooperation we receive from other nations on law enforcement, counterterrorism, and other issues; our commercial, economic, and financial interests, including a potential loss of international trust in U.S. firms and the decreased willingness of other nations to participate in international data sharing, privacy, and regulatory regimes; the credibility of our commitment to an open, interoperable, and secure global Internet; and the protection of intelligence sources and methods.”
Missoulian: Lawmakers weary from fiscal wars send Obama budget
H.R.3547 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014
Senate amendment to H.R. 3547
“Reduces funds for the salaries, benefits, and expenses of any positions within the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice that were assigned to administer or enforce Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. These jobs were rendered irrelevant after the Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby v. Holder.”

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Economy/ Budget/ DaimlerChrysler Suit/ LCD Price Fixing



Missoulian: Dozens of trade-offs in $1.1 trillion budget bill
Rogers: Omnibus Targets Funding to Important Programs, Continues Downward Trend in Federal Spending
“Their complaint alleges that Mercedes-Benz Argentina (MB Argentina), an Argentinian subsidiary of Daimler, collaborated with state security forces during Argentina’s 1976–1983 “Dirty War” to kidnap, detain, torture, and kill certain MB Argentina workers, among them, plaintiffs or persons closely related to plaintiffs.”

Monday, January 13, 2014

Abortion Ban/ Recess Appointments



The panel reversed the district court’s order denying declaratory and  injunctive relief to plaintiffs and held that the Constitution does not permit the Arizona legislature to prohibit abortion beginning at twenty weeks gestation, before the fetus is viable.