Missoulian: Justice refuses to block morning-after pill rule
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius (12/26/2012)
“Applicants do not satisfy the demanding standard for the
extraordinary relief they seek. First, whatever the ultimate merits of the
applicants’ claims, their entitlement to relief is not “indisputably clear.”
Lux v. Rodrigues, 561
U. S. ___, ___ (2010) (ROBERTS, C. J., in chambers) (slip
op., at 2) (internal quotation marks omitted). This Court has not previously
addressed similar RFRA or free exercise claims brought by closely held
for-profit corporations and their controlling shareholders alleging that the
mandatory provision of certain employee benefits substantially burdens their
exercise of religion.”
Missoulian: 6 Montana State Parks offer guided hikes Jan. 1
No comments:
Post a Comment